Saturday, 13 July 2024

The Essex Marshes: Dracula, Magwitch, Vikings...and Serpents?

The Flying Serpent. Or: Strange News out of Essex. Being: A true Relation of a Monstrous Serpent which hath divers times been seen at a Parish called Henham-on-the-Mount within 4 miles of Saffron Walden. Showing the length, proportion and bigness of the Serpent, the place, where it commonly lurks, and what means hath been used to kill it. Also a discourse of other Serpents, and of a cocatrice killed at Saffron Walden (1669) - Wikimedia Commons

Essex Marshes have long been a magnet for the mysterious and macabre

The county of Essex is a strange place; part London overspill, part criminal hang-out, part dated seaside resort, part hayseed farming community, part home to the tasteless newly-made wealthy, and part strange, forbidding Anglo-Saxon fenland, full of superstitions, bloody battles and literary demons.

The region has even influenced G.R.R. Martin’s Game of Thrones (GoT), with the author purloining the River Blackwater and the Battle of Maldon for his opening tome in the series.

Game of Thrones
Anglo-Saxon Essex and Middlesex (Wikmedia Commons)

GoT’s The Crown Lands - even looks a little like Essex:

essex

The bleak marshes have also played home to other literary characters, including Bram Stoker’s blood-sucking Dracula (Purfleet) and Magwitch, Dickens’ misunderstood criminal miscreant.

essex
Plaque on Wall, Purfleet (Wikimedia Commons)
Magwitch: "[a] fearful man, all in coarse gray, with a great iron on his leg. A man with no hat, and with broken shoes, and with an old rag tied round his head. A man who had been soaked in water, and smothered in mud, and lamed by stones, and cut by flints, and stung by nettles, and torn by briars; who limped and shivered, and glared and growled; and whose teeth chattered in his head as he seized me by the chin."
Great Expectations, Pip and Magwitch on the marshes, by John McLenan (1860 - Wikimedia Commons)
William Finlay Currie as Abel Magwitch in David Lean’s Great Expectations (1946)

The Battle of Maldon (11 August 991 AD)

This was a real GoT-style donnybrook between the Essex Fyrd of Anglo-Saxons under towering, white-locked, sixty-year-old Earl Byrhtnoth and the Northmen led by the younger, gold-obsessed Olaf Tryggvason, King of Norway.

It is a tale of honour to the point of foolishness, as Byrhtnoth refused to pay the Vikings off to leave, and then agreed to let the raiders cross the causeway from their base at Northey Island and fight his militia one-on-one. The Earl, predictably enough, died in the ensuing melee, but only after taking out at least three Vikings.

The clash was the subject of the alliterative classic Old English poem The Battle of Maldon, as well as J.R.R. Tolkien's playlet, The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth, Beorhthelm's Son, which takes place on the battlefield of Maldon and the search for Earl Byrhtnoth's decapitated body.

essex
Northey Island (Wikimedia Commons)
Wikimedia Commons
Byrhtnoth statue, Maldon. Byrhtnoth, Earl of Essex. hero and loser of the Battle of Maldon in 991 (Wikimedia Commons)

The Essex Serpent

Author Sarah Perry on the inspiration for her novel of the same name, ‘I first heard of this mythical serpent courtesy of my husband, who’d been reading a little 1938 book called ‘Companion Into Essex’. The book includes an excerpt from a pamphlet printed at Clerkenwell in 1669, which relates the appearance of “a Monstrous Serpent”. The pamphlet goes on to show “the length, proportion, the bigness of the Serpent, the places where it commonly lurks and what means hath been used to kill it.” I’m still uncertain why this pamphlet detonated my imagination in quite the way it did, but four years later I’d completed a novel in which the Essex Serpent returns to menace the 1890’s coastal village of Aldwinter. As I wrote, I relied on Google images of the original pamphlet, which is headed STRANGE NEWS OUT OF ESSEX and bears a wonderful wood-cut of a quite benevolent-looking animal being poked at with lances by men on horseback.

It was a long time before I thought to consult the British Library catalogues: perhaps I’d convinced myself that the entire business had only been in my imagination. But there it was, on my laptop screen in my Norwich study: The Flying Serpent, or, strange news out of Essex, being a true relation of a Serpent seen at Henham on the Mount, etc. London, [1669?].

I recall feeling a little nervous, convinced up to the last moment that the pamphlet I’d pored over online for so long could not be real.

The pamphlet was kept inside a hard binding to protect it. When I opened the covers, there was the vanillin scent of old paper. And there he was, just as I’d seen him in the dead of night on my computer screen, or printed out on a reused sheet of paper: the Strange News, the Essex Serpent, with his owl-like eyes and his dear little wings and his slightly gormless smile. Not a bit like the near-invisible malevolent presence that saturates my novel, but as familiar to me as an old pet. I sat with it a long while, reading again that wry opening, imagining a laconic Essex farmer reading it out: “Guests, fish and news go stale in three days’ time, and nothing delights an Englishman’s fancy so much as new novelties…”

Liz Trenow, author of The Secrets of the Lake:

But this is not the only story of mysterious creatures from the county. There is another, much earlier, myth of a serpent or dragon that terrorised the villagers of Bures and Wormingford near Colchester.

Indeed Wormingford, originally Withermundford, was renamed in honour of the legend, ‘worme’ being a medieval term for a dragon. It was first reported in 1405 by a monk who thrillingly described ‘an evil dragon of excessive length with a huge body, crested head, saw-like teeth and elongated tail... arrows sprang from its ribs as if they were metal or hard stone’.

One theory is that this 'dragon' was in fact a crocodile given as a gift by King Saladin to King Richard I during the 12th century Crusades and originally kept at the Tower of London. It somehow escaped – perhaps from a travelling menagerie – and found its way to the River Stour, where it started stealing sheep and, so the legend goes, demanding to be fed virgins until the supply began to run out. In desperation the villagers turned to a local knight, Sir George of Layer de la Haye, who efficiently despatched the beast as though his mother had named him for the task.

Wormingford Church

However, local lore has it that the crocodile or dragon lives on in Wormingford Mere to this day, and mysterious bubbles are seen when the beast is displeased. If it is disturbed, the story goes, evil things will happen in the community. I was brought up in a nearby village and one of my earliest memories is of visiting Wormingford Church to see the stained glass window in which the ‘dragon’ is dramatically depicted being slain by a knight on a white charger.

https://blogs.bl.uk/living-knowledge/2016/08/on-the-trail-of-the-essex-serpent.html

Looking north-east across salt-marshes. This was the view on a late autumn late afternoon. In the middle distance, slightly left of centre is part of Skipper's Island Nature Reserve and on the distant skyline, to the left, are the silhouettes of cranes at Harwich/Felixstowe container ports (Wikimedia Commons)

Stephen Arnell’s debut novel THE GREAT ONE is available worldwide on Amazon Kindle:

Saturday, 6 July 2024

Voices from the Wreckage: The Haunting of the R101 Airship

The R101 airship disaster of 1930 is not just a story of aviation gone wrong, but a tale with overtones of the supernatural. Beyond the technical failures and human errors, the involvement of renowned Irish medium Eileen Garrett and esteemed paranormal investigator Harry Price has given the tragedy an aura of mystery. As early as 1926, Garrett, who had displayed psychic abilities from a young age, began having vivid premonitions of an airship disaster over London, warning of fire, smoke, and an impending tragedy. Her warnings, however, went unheeded by aviation authorities. This article delves into the eerie events leading up to the crash, the séances that followed, and the lingering spirits that continue to interest paranormal researchers.

The British Airship Industry: A Tale of Two Airships

airship r101
Victor A. Chapman, c1929. From collection owned by SkyeWaye, CC BY-SA 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

The R100, completed first by a private company, Vickers, was relatively successful. It embarked on a maiden voyage to Canada in 1930, demonstrating a degree of reliability and operational success. The R100's construction emphasized private innovation and was led by a team including the notable Barnes Wallis, later famous for his role in designing the bouncing bomb during World War II. The R100's successful transatlantic flight showcased the potential of airships for long-distance travel and raised expectations for their future use.

In contrast, the R101 was primarily a government-funded venture, representing a significant investment in state-sponsored engineering. This airship was intended to surpass the R100 in size and capability, symbolizing British technological prowess. However, the R101 project was marred by political pressure, design compromises, and rushed timelines. The government's involvement aimed to demonstrate national strength and innovation, but it ultimately highlighted the pitfalls of bureaucratic interference in technical endeavors.

The R101 Airship: A Vision of Grandeur Turned Tragic

The R101 was envisioned as an ambitious project that would showcase British engineering prowess and help connect the vast British Empire through luxurious air travel. Stretching over 730 feet and filled with more than 5 million cubic feet of flammable hydrogen gas, the enormous airship promised to revolutionize long-distance transportation with unparalleled speed and comfort.

However, the development of the R101 was beset with challenges from the start. Its design incorporated diesel engines instead of petrol to reduce fire risks, but this made the engines heavier, requiring the addition of an extra central segment to increase hydrogen lift capacity. This compromise was one of many unsatisfactory solutions adopted during the airship's construction.

Other issues like insufficient engine power, faulty elevator controls, and miscalculated weight loads also raised concerns among engineers about the R101's airworthiness. Despite technical advisories to delay the maiden flight until these problems could be properly addressed, there was immense political pressure from officials like Lord Thomson, the Secretary of State for Air, to launch on schedule.

Anxious to showcase Britain's airship ambitions, Thomson insisted the R101 depart for India as planned on 4 October 1930, with him aboard as a passenger. This pivotal decision to prematurely launch the flawed airship, against expert recommendations, set the stage for the upcoming catastrophe over France less than 24 hours later.

So while the R101 embodied the grand visions of a globe-spanning British airship fleet, its rush to operation despite clear design faults and inadequate testing foreshadowed the tragedy that would unfold on its very first voyage.

The Crash Site: A Scene of Tragedy

The R101's ill-fated journey came to a tragic end in the early hours of 5 October 1930, when the airship crashed near the village of Allonne, close to Beauvais in northern France. The airship encountered severe weather, and combined with its inherent design flaws, this led to its catastrophic descent. Upon crashing, the R101 burst into flames, fuelled by the vast quantities of hydrogen it carried. Of the 54 people on board, only six survived the inferno. The crash site became a scene of horror and tragedy, with debris scattered over a wide area and the remains of the airship smoldering amidst the French countryside.

Eileen Garrett: The Medium with Premonitions

Eileen Garrett, born in 1893 in Ireland, was a renowned medium known for her psychic abilities such as seeing auras, out-of-body experiences, and communicating with spiritual entities she called "controls" named Uvani and Abdul Latif. Despite a difficult childhood marked by family tragedies and questions about her sanity, Garrett persisted in exploring her gifts.

Prior to the R101 crash, Garrett experienced vivid premonitions warning of the impending tragedy on three separate occasions in 1926, 1928, and 1929. Although her warnings about an airship disaster over central London were not heeded at the time, they gained significance in the aftermath of the horrific event.

Harry Price's Initial Involvement

Two days after the devastating R101 crash, renowned paranormal investigator Harry Price organised a séance with the specific aim of attempting to contact the spirit of the recently deceased Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of Sherlock Holmes. Price had arranged this séance at the National Laboratory of Psychical Research in London with Eileen Garrett as the medium, ostensibly to allow journalists to interview Conan Doyle's spirit.

However, the séance took an entirely unexpected turn when Garrett instead channelled the voice of Flight Lieutenant H. Carmichael Irwin, one of the R101's crew members who perished in the disaster. Unbeknownst to Garrett, her trance state gave way to Irwin's spirit rather than Conan Doyle's, and the séance was overtaken by astonishingly specific technical details about the issues that had brought down the airship.

The voice channelled through Garrett provided an array of startlingly accurate information, including details about the R101's insufficient engine capacity, elevator malfunctions, incorrect weight calculations, and even a reference to the ship nearly "scraping the roofs at Achy"  a tiny hamlet close to the crash site unlikely to be known to the medium. For 40 minutes, Irwin's spirit seemed to communicate a wealth of insider knowledge about the disaster through Garrett.

Price, a famously skeptical investigator, meticulously documented the session, realizing the profound implications if this truly represented communication from one of the victims. The technical accuracy of the information imparted appeared to be beyond Garrett's conscious knowledge at the time.

The Séances and Supernatural Encounters

Following the initial séance, Garrett continued to conduct sessions where she claimed to communicate with the spirits of the R101 victims, often in the very Cardington hangar in Bedfordshire where the doomed airship was built. These séances were marked by a pervasive sense of dread and encounters with restless spirits expressing frustration and sorrow, and also asking to be left alone, suggesting the souls of the lost crew and passengers were not at peace.

Harry Price's Continued Investigation

Price, known for his rigorous approach, was initially skeptical but became impressed by the startling technical accuracy of Garrett's mediumship. Experts like John Charlton from the Royal Airship Works concluded it seemed Captain Irwin himself had communicated through Garrett, providing around 40 references indicating confidential, first-hand knowledge of the R101 that she could not have known.

The Parapsychological Studies

Garrett's abilities garnered significant interest from the scientific community. In the 1950s, she helped establish the Parapsychology Foundation in New York, which conducted extensive research into her mediumship and psychic phenomena. In 1957, Jungian psychologist Dr. Ira Progoff analyzed Garrett's trance sessions and offered an interpretation that her "spirit controls" were not separate entities, but rather "symbolic forms of dramatization" representing deep "principles of life." However, for witnesses privy to the specificity of her communications, a spiritual explanation remained plausible.

Legacy and Ongoing Mysteries

The R101 disaster had a profound impact on British airship development, prompting critical safety reforms. The alleged supernatural accounts raised deeper questions about life after death and spirit communication. While some dismissed these stories as superstition, others believed that the voices from beyond the grave provided valuable insights into the tragedy.

Researchers like Price meticulously documented Garrett's mediumship, lending credibility to her abilities. The lasting allure of the R101's haunting tales ensures the story continues to captivate those seeking answers about the disaster's causes and the possibility of an afterlife.

Conclusion

The R101 disaster is more than a historical footnote; it's a tale of human ambition, technical shortcomings, and inexplicable voices from the other side. As we remember the crew and passengers lost, we're reminded that some mysteries defy rational explanations. The haunting of the R101 serves as a powerful testament to the enduring power of the human spirit and curiosity about the great unknowns that lie beyond our perception.

Whether one believes in the supernatural or not, the story of the R101 and the prophetic visions and mediumistic communications surrounding it continue to captivate and mystify. The voices and premonitions associated with the disaster have secured its place not just in aviation history, but in the annals of the paranormal, ensuring that its legacy lives on, both in tangible fact and the realm of the inexplicable.

Sources:

"Eileen Garrett and the World Beyond the Senses" by Allan Angoff

"Harry Price: The Psychic Detective" by Richard Morris

 "Harry Price Website" http://www.harrypricewebsite.co.uk/

“The Airmen Who Would Not Die” by John G. Fuller

"Fatal Flight The True Story of Britain's Last Great Airship" by Bill Hammack 

Wednesday, 3 July 2024

The Gallows Hills of England

The haunting sites where criminals were hanged on public gibbets

gallows hills
Gallows Hill, Skidby, East Riding of Yorkshire, England.(Wikimedia Commons)

Gibbeting (also ‘Hanging in Chains’): a gallows from which the dead - or dying bodies of criminals were hanged on public display to deter other existing or potential criminals. Also used as a method of public execution, with the criminal being left to die of exposure, thirst and/or starvation. (Wikipedia)

There are a great many Gallows Hills in England, probably running into the dozens; places where the gibbets were set up to warn of the deadly penalty for many crimes in Ye Olde Days. Some, I’m quite sure, would be happy to bring them back though, both here and further afield, 'pour encourager les autres', as the saying goes.

The locations are often very evocative, and, if on your own, pretty eerie, such as this one near where I currently abide, at least two only 20 minutes away - although one may actually be miss attributed as gibbet-places due to their aspect and are Neolithic remains:

gallows hill
Ivinghoe Beacon Barrow Alternative Name: Gallows Hill (Wikimedia Commons)
gallows
Galley Hill in Stony Stratford, Buckinghamshire (Patrick Comerford)

A few chilling stories related to the practice of gibbeting:

Busby’s Cursed Chair

busby stoop inn - gallows hills
The Busby Stoop Inn, North Yorkshire (Wikimedia Commons)

The Busby Stoop Inn boasts the macbre sight of the noose and gallows on the front of this otherwise welcoming tavern.

Former landlord Thomas Busby, was a drunk, bully, and general scoundrel. One day in 1702, Busby lost his temper and bludgeoned his father-in-law to death, either over kind of counterfeiting racket fallout, or his caddish treatment of the wife. Busby was sentenced to be hung on the other side of the crossroads from his pub, his body gibbetted and left to rot there. But before his execution, however, Busby was allowed to have a final bevy. Rising from his favourite chair he cursed the seat, saying any who parked their backside in it would endure a premature and violent death. Charming.

Across the centuries, some fools (and others) have taken in their heads to sit Busby’s chair, and all have supposedly fallen prey to his malediction. Tricked by his colleagues into sitting on the seat, a builder shortly afterwards fell through the roof of the house he was working on and bashed his skull open . During WWII, some Canadian airmen dared each other to sit on the chair - soon after, their plane crashed, killing everyone.

A former landlord as a result hid the chair in the cellar. But one day a tired beer delivery man spotted the seat and decided to take a rest on it. Predictably his lorry soon crashed, killing him. The chair now abides in nearby Thirsk museum, high on a wall to deter those tempted to use it as Olde Worlde suicide booth. But some said that the seat’s machine-turned spindles date it to after to 1840, 138 years after Busby's execution. So his recliner might still be around, waiting for the posterior of its next victim.

The Busby Stoop Inn is now an Indian restaurant called Jaipur Spice, but the shade of Busby has still be seen lurking there, grimacing evilly at the curry-scarfing, lager-quaffing customers.

Gibbet Hill, Coventry

Gnarled tree, Gibbet Hill (Wikimedia Commons)

Gibbet Hill (or Gallows Hill as it was originally known) lies on the outskirts of Coventry and was used as a place of execution only once. In 1765, three soldiers of Lord’s Pembroke’s Regiment of Dragoons (some say two soldiers and one weaver), Robert Leslie, Edward Drury and Moses Baker (who may have been the weaver) wearing disguises, mugged three yokels returning from the Coventry market. One of these - Thomas Edwards from Stoneleigh, died. The trio were arrested, found guilty at Warwick Assizes and sentenced to hang until dead at Gibbet Hill.

The judge ordered that the men “be hung in chains on Stoneleigh Common, above Wenbury Wood, by the Three Mile Stone”. After being hanged, the bodies were taken down, tarred, fettered in metal suits and rehung, remaining there for the next 45 years. The gibbet itself was still standing in 1822. IAfter being taken down, some souvenirs made from the wood, and the main structure recycled in a nearby farm building. Uh-oh. No surprise then as for many years stories of hauntings and strange sights were common in the area. Old Gallow Hill then became known as Gibbet Hill, continuing to remind all of its grisly history. Along with the ghostly rattling of the murderers’ chains.

Local folklore recounts that Coventry soothsayers at the time claimed that if a hare ran out from under the scaffold, a reprieve would be on the way from Warwick Assizes. Word about the prophecy got around and the spectators watched for the hare, which indeed popped up when the three arrived for their executions. As the crowd (who knew of the prophecy) grew restive , the sheriff was forced by circumstances to delay the hanging, sending a messenger to Warwick ask whether there was indeed a reprieve. But there was not, so they all carked it.

In a local pub after the event, a bet was placed on whether anyone would have the courage to approach the gibbet and ask its three occupants how they were doing. Some clod took said wager. Late that evening, in the dark, cold, rainy night, he asked of the gibbet occupants, “How be you three?” to which they replied , “very wet and cold”. The brave fellow understandably fled in terror, only to discover that it had been one of chums from the pub, hiding in a bush. B*astard.

Winter’s Gibbet

Winter's Gibbet (Wikimedia Commons)

Murderer, wanderer and highwayman, William Winter’s body hung on the lonely Northumberland gibbet until it rotted away. After that, his bones were scattered, though his skull was sent to one Mr Darnell in Newcastle. Winter’s shade is said to haunt the surrounding moorlands, causing sudden thick fogs and of appearing to startle rustic types and tourists at a nearby cattle grid.

It’s said you can cure toothache by cutting a splinter off the gibbet and rubbing where there was pain. Objects associated with executions were believed to have magical or healing properties - a hanged man’s clothing or filleted skin were prized as talismans. Some rascals thought that the mitt of an executed felon – known as a Hand of Glory – could entrance victims into a deep sleep. That the current Winter’s Gibbet is a replica doesn’t seem to have dented its fame for curing dental distress, as some oafs still chip bits off... The head suspended from his Steng Cross Gibbet (built on the remains of an ancient Saxon cross) is made of concrete; there was once a entire body, but ignorant locals used to shoot at the figure or steal it for peasant japery, so it was taken away with only the noggin remaining.

The Last Days of Gibbeting and Public Gallows

Gibbeting was always a controversial practice. Complaints abounded regarding the stench and sight of the decaying corpses. To stop the burial of those hanged, gibbet posts were made so high to make retrieving them difficult; some also had nails sticking out to discourage attempts to cut the corpses down.

Diarist Samuel Pepys (1633-1703) and others expressed their repellence at the practice and sentiments grew as The Age of Enlightenment kicked in. Doubts were voiced about what the moral effects of public gibbeting could be; such as the case, a 16-year-old lass who invited a friend to picnic beneath a gibbet and gave her poisoned cake, to pay her back for getting the job she wanted.

The last public gibbetings in England were those of Jarrow miner William Jobbing, and James Cook, a Leicester bookbinder, both in 1832. Jobbing was soon cut down by his fellow miners and buried decently. Cook’s body was taken down by the authorities after a few days, due to disgusted complaints from those who neighboured the site. Gibbeting was abolished two years later in 1834.

But public hangings continued, often large-scale events, drawing thousands of onlookers; Charles Dickens, wrote a letter to The Times, condemning the, ‘wickedness and levity of the immense crowd … The horrors of the gibbet and of the crimes which brought the wretched murderers to it faded in my mind before the atrocious bearing, looks and language of the assembled spectators.’ He called many who attended the executions, ‘thieves, low prostitutes, ruffians and vagabonds of every kind’ indulging in ‘every variety of offensive and foul behaviour … fightings, faintings, whistlings … brutal jokes’ with ‘tumultuous demonstrations of indecent delight.’

From 1868, hangings were confined to being conducted behind prison walls. The UK’s final (to date) official hangings took place in 1964 - Gwynne Evans and Peter Allen.

In Orson Welles’ Othello (1951), Iago (Micheál Mac Liammóir) is condemned to be gibbeted.

But the continuing fascination with the places has led to several gibbets being reconstructed in England, confirming (to some) the intensely morbid sensibility of the nation:

Berkshire’s Combe Gibbet replica (Wikimedia Commons)
Gallows-style gibbet at Caxton Gibbet, Cambridgeshire, England (Wikimedia Commons)
Wapping gibbet, by the Thames (Wikimedia Commons)
The Swinburne Arms Gibbet Erected Sunday 7th March 2010 by Mr Peter Athey (Wikimedia Commons)
The Bilstone Gibbet, Leicestershire (Wikimedia Commons)
The memorial cross on the site of the gallows at Gibbet Hill, Hindhead, Surrey (Wikimedia Commons)

And even commemorative plaques:

Wikimedia Commons

A View from a Hill

During a walk through the countryside with the Squire, inquisitive historian Fanshawe looks at a plain field through the cursed binoculars and spots an abbey which is invisible other than through the glasses. Next to it is Gallows Hill, where people were hanged.

The 2023 BBC Two series:

Stephen Arnell’s historical novel, THE GREAT ONE, is now available on Amazon Kindle:

Tuesday, 2 July 2024

What Constitutes Real Evidential Mediumship?

Value of Understanding Real Evidential Mediumship

mediumship

Mediumship has enjoyed remarkable growth in the recent decades. More people are realizing the importance of real evidential mediumship in helping those who are suffering start the healing process. In reality though, everyone you meet these days is a medium. Many people don't really know what mediumship is or its long and diverse history. They rely on what they see in the media.

They believe they can save and heal people, but it's not true. What they think is evidential mediumship is not, and they call themselves evidential mediums, not really understanding what constitutes evidential mediumship. We then settle for poor standards and accept psychic intuition as spirit communication, and they are not communicating with spirit in any way. The communication is not flowing, consistently poor and has no pattern of an evidential story.

We cannot believe that what we see in the media constitutes the real story of mediumship. One person may have a little intuitive insight and wrongly think they are in communication. More now than ever, there is a real need to understand the process of mediumship and what constitutes good, supporting evidence. The lack of real evidence is just cannon fodder to our skeptical brethren, and who could blame them? If we are to stand any chance of being accepted as a legitimate practice, science or dare I say even a spiritual based philosophy, then there must be a certain standard of evidence that is easily accepted. However, there is a caveat and that may have to be the content of a part 2 “One persons’ evidence is another’s failure.”

Recognizing Evidential Mediumship

There are many self-proclaimed psychic mediums out there who do not understand the values of evidential mediumship or what constitutes evidence, and who, unknowingly, often read the auric energy, and talk in general terms about life issues and personality traits, rather than give real, valuable evidence.

I am not suggesting this is fraud, as the individual may be well-meaning and slightly ignorant of the mechanics of mediumship. Consequently, those experiencing the reading remain unaware and untrained, and do not understand what constitutes real evidence from a communicating spirit. So the sitter is more likely to accept certain validations as fact when in reality, they are rather general, including descriptions and personalities that could fit almost anyone, unless it was something unusual.

Our Rich History In Mediumship

Communicating with the other side has existed for thousands of years within tribes and varied cultures. The history of mediumship is rich with characters whose mediumship has even changed the course of history. In fact, most people think that spiritualism started with the Fox Sisters, but in reality, it was going on way before that. There have been many remarkable mediums in the past who shaped the history of spiritualism.

Leonora Piper

One of the most remarkable mediums of her time was Leonora Piper, whose level of evidence was astounding. She was one of the most tested mediums of her time and offered herself as a subject of inquiry for members of the Society Of Psychical Research (SPR). For many years, renowned psychical researchers such as Sir Oliver Lodge and philosopher William James collaborated closely with Leonora. She was able to give veridical evidence of life after death using her mental mediumship and unique ability with deep trance mediumship. Unlike many other mediums of her time, she was never caught in fraud.

Daniel Dunglas Home

Another remarkable medium of his time was Daniel Dunglas Home, who was a Scottish medium that was considered to be one of the finest physical mediums of his time and was witnessed to have levitated many times during séances. Like Piper, Daniel was never found fraudulent even though there were claims of fraud. The claims were often unfounded and the result of 3rd party gossip.

Real Evidential Mediumship

Real evidential mediumship is characterized by the delivery of specific, verifiable information that could not have been known to the medium through ordinary means. This includes details such as names, dates, personal anecdotes, and other precise facts that are unique to the spirit being communicated with. The accuracy of these details often provides comfort and validation to those seeking connection with their loved ones who have passed on. Furthermore, authentic evidential mediums typically demonstrate a consistent ability to produce such evidence across multiple readings and clients, which helps distinguish genuine practitioners from those relying on generalities or cold reading techniques.

evidential mediumship

Examples Of Communication

Consider the following two messages and identify what you perceive to be the best type of validation:

First Medium: “I have a father figure here, and he is coming around you with a great deal of love. He passed with a heart or chest condition. He is saying that you were very special to him and that you found it difficult when he passed. He is about 5 ft 10 and a bit rotund, wears glasses and smokes, and has a great personality. He says sorry for what you went through and identifies that you stepped up to help the family. You could always wrap him round your finger and that he would give you anything he could. He is strong in stature and looks like a powerful man. Do you understand?”

This message is perceived by many as good, and the sitter feels validated because certain pieces of information have been covered – especially if they are grieving badly and reaching for anything. Due to the sitter’s need to hear the information, they accept it and begin to open up more – offering leading answers that feed the medium such as, “yes he had a heart attack, and I was the one dealing with everything”.

Second Example

The medium confirms that is what they were getting and feels good because they think they have a hit. The reality is that the medium has offered no real evidence for the grieving individual.

Second Medium: I have a male figure coming through with the name Micheal and what sounds like Thompson or Johnson. He says thank you for talking with him when you were walking through the park yesterday and that you thought about him when you stood by the bed of flowers with the statue in the middle. He also says that you were in a store like Macy’s, and you nearly bought a new pair of shoes but changed your mind, placing them back. He often comes around you and notes that he was with you when you were mending the chair that you recently broke in the kitchen. He was trying to tell you how to do it and laughs at your attempt. He mentions the name Mateo or a name that sounds like this, and also I have to give you Anaheim road or place. Can you understand this? He also tells me that you have an anniversary in July and another on the 5th May. He wants to send love to his wife and the name I am given is Mary. He also shows me that you have his watch with you now. Can you accept that?

Validation

If this information is validated by the sitter in its entirety or at least 80%, it would be considered as stronger evidence; even better, if more evidence is given that the sitter can’t validate until much later by a third party. This would suggest the sitter had no knowledge of the imparted information and would have to wait until it was validated by a third party, thus suggesting the information could only have been derived from a communicating entity that previously knew the third party.

Considerations

Obviously, how one delivers this type of message has some bearing on how the evidence is offered, but generally, there should be no questions or assumptions. The medium should be able to give the name or a name that is as close as possible. It is not good practice to throw out a random letter unless the evidence that supports it is overwhelming. Like a jigsaw puzzle or a map, the evidence will be a unique and precise part of a larger story. As human beings, we are built for story telling and its how we communicate and learn. This is no different in the world of spirit. The evidence is often built upon stories that come together to make a cohesive evidence trail.

Inadequately Trained Working Mediums Risk Early Failure

Many inexperienced individuals that claim to be spiritual mediums, choose to work with clients or give public demonstrations long before they are ready, and risk becoming unbalanced very quickly. They get caught up with their own egos and also fall into the trap of feeding from the sitter, jumping on with link stealers and making what they believe is evidence, fit. This has been exemplified by well known mediums in the spotlight who are dismally unprofessional, but got the break because they know someone who knows someone.

This is true in all forms of mediumship. A consequence of media and ignorance of the mechanics, and having never received professional training in delivering messages or etiquette on how to act and work as a professional medium. In these circumstances, failure has a tendency to loom and skeptics lurk like hungry hyenas waiting to pounce on their next meal. Moreover, the damage that can be done to someone who is on a grieving journey is unimaginable.

A Medium’s Responsibility

It is a great responsibility to do the work of a professional medium. Therefore, you should be appropriately prepared and trained to operate within the highest standards possible and know what constitutes good evidence. There are many organizations that exist to test, validate, and investigate mediumship. Organizations such as the Windbridge Institute, ISSMPI and the Forever Family Foundation share a common goal of encouraging professional mediumship standards.

Unfortunately, there are many individuals who remain deluded and do not understand real mediumship nor the mechanics, such as knowing the difference between spirit contact and reading psychic energy. They promote themselves as mediums but have no prior history or training. They have no idea of real mediumship and are often giving misleading or false information. They may well have a good heart and want to help, but just do not have the ability to communicate with spirit.

From time to time, even professional mediums will not be able to communicate consistently. This can be due to personal circumstances, the conditions and the needs of the sitter. However, it is important to recognize real mediumship for what it is.

Take these notes on board when looking for a medium

  1. Always try to identify with a professional medium who has a relevant history and experience.
  2. Check the testimonials. If you have been recommended by someone - even better.
  3. If the medium asks too many questions before the appointment, leave well alone.
  4. Do not feed the medium information.
  5. Check if the medium is involved with professional organizations or has served in spiritualist churches.
  6. If you are not sure, ask if you can approach any of the testimonial authors. If this is possible, the medium should put you in touch with a couple of people who will validate them.
  7. A professional medium should never tell you negative things and if you are faced with someone who tells you that they can sort out your life, bring your lover back or clear a curse – run and run far. Remember there is really no such thing as ‘Best Psychic Mediums’ but there are great evidential mediums to be found.

Sunday, 30 June 2024

The Afterlife Equation: E = MC2

Credit: Taton Moise, Unsplash

(Part 1 of three.)

Albert Einstein’s iconic equation, E = MC2, is part of his special theory of relativity. But it is also a handy summary of what happens when the physical bodies die but the soul/consciousness survives. Hence, this article’s title. ‘The afterlife Equation.’

This most famous of equations states that E, the energy content of a body (the planet Mars or a tree), is equal to its mass, M, times (or accelerated by) the velocity of light squared, C2, which is the speed of light multiplied by itself. That is 186,281.7 miles per second times 186,281.7 miles per second. Pretty darn fast.

Einstein published E = MC2 in 1905, the year he earned his doctorate in physics, without much follow-up. He focused more on developing a solid theoretical basis for his concept of relativity.

Although it may have been only of passing interest to Einstein, this equation transformed the field of physics. In one stroke, Einstein overturned a fundamental tenet that had stood since the 17th century days of Sir Isaac Newton. He held that energy and matter are separate and distinct and have no relationship to each other.

Matter and Energy

This equation states otherwise. It proposes the fundamental equivalence of matter and energy by demonstrating that they produce equivalent effects. This was Einstein's “principle of equivalence,” which states that if two phenomena produce equivalent effects, they must be different manifestations of the same fundamental law.

The equivalence principle is Einstein's most momentous conclusion. It is regarded as the foundation of modern physics. And, in the grand tradition of free inquiry and questioning everything, let us play with this tantalizing possibility: Something can go faster than the speed of light. What exactly could that something be? Could E = MC2 actually hold the key to unifying science and spirituality or even to the theory of everything (TOE)?

Please note the word here is spirituality, not religion. If science and religion ever line up on the same team, the rest of us are toast. (Dogmas backed by data? Nightmare!)

The Afterlife’s Equation - Scientific Heresy

To pose an answer, let’s commit scientific heresy (yay!) and rework E = MC2. Why not? This equation is not holy writ, even if scientists do tend to revere it and the shaggy-haired genius who first devised it. And since it’s just a bunch of variables, we are free to make those variables stand for anything we want them to represent.

We are searching for a greatly enlarged understanding of equivalence, beyond just matter and energy. To achieve this, we start by redefining all the variables except M. This variable remains the same and means mass, or matter. We need new definitions, however, for E and C2 or our equivalence principle won’t differ from the original.

Our current understanding of energy, the E in the equation, is much too limited. At present, science defines energy as the capacity for work, or the ability to do work. And that definition confines energy strictly to the material universe, cutting off any spiritual connections.

We seek a new definition of energy that transcends the limitations of the strictly material, because that new definition of energy will help explain why it’s possible to exceed the speed of light, how to unify science and spirituality, and establish a TOE.

Energy is the capacity for (the ability to) love.

afterlife equation capacity for love

This deceptively simple redefinition of energy holds profound implications. The capacity for love or the ability to love encompasses but is not limited to the ability to do work. The ability to love embraces and addresses spiritual realities in addition to the physical universe. E, defined as the ability to love, is precisely what we need in our TOE, or theory of everything.

E, then, represents the complete energy spectrum, nonphysical as well as physical. Moreover, the E in our equation also encompasses a very special type of energy: the ability to love without hindrance, limitation, or restriction. In other words, E represents the highest, widest, most powerful possible energy or ability to love, which is love unlimited by any conditions.

This E has been known by many names to many people. Scientists call it the God particle, but it is not a particle according to their understanding of such. The ancient Chinese gave it the name chi (also written as QI), and, recognizing its healing potential, made use of it through acupuncture and acupressure. The ancient Hindus named it prana, the “life force” that sustains everything.

What they’re all really talking about is unconditional love, or love without condition or limitation. E stands for unconditional love, meaning that unconditional love is the fundamental building block of the material as well as the nonmaterial universe. Furthermore, E is seamless and not divisible into ever smaller and smaller units. E is divine essence, the ultimate source of everything and the ultimate power anywhere.

A Vibrational Universal Concept

afterlife equation

What gives E such power? To explain that requires us to recognize something that is a fundamental characteristic of E and the entire universe: It is all based on vibration.

The concept of vibration as the foundation of all realities is not new. Thousands of years ago, Heraclitus, one of the earliest known Greek philosophers, intuitively grasped this principle. He maintained that everything is constantly in flux or motion. String theory from modern particle physics states that all realities, perceptible or not, consist of the essence of strings of vibrating particles.

Vibration-based change, or what Heraclitus called flux, is the only constant in life. In other words, everything and all things, nonmaterial as well as material, are fundamentally vibrational frequencies. This is why mathematics can help us explain a great deal about our multiverse. Mathematics is the language of vibrational frequencies.

We see the physical counterpart of flux and string theory by making the simplest of observations. The weather changes. The seasons come and go in cycles. The water in the oceans constantly migrates around the globe. Out of the acorn arises the oak tree, changing greatly throughout the course of its development.

E is most powerful, then, because there are no limits to its vibrational range. There is no ending, no beginning. E, that divine essence-energy, that ultimate source, encompasses all other vibrational frequencies, meaning everything else that exists.

(Part 2’s redefinition E = MC2 explains what goes faster than the speed of light. )

Become a PDN Ambassador